Press Release: Injunction against NSH “deemed resigned” deadline.

On February 21, 2024 Nova Scotia Health (NSH), a private charity organization, sent out a policy change letter to NSH employees who, for the last 800+ days, had been on involuntary unpaid leave due to the organization’s COVID-19 vaccination policy.
The recipients of this letter were given an arbitrary deadline of March 15 to state their intent to return to work or be “deemed resigned”, a function that cannot be performed by an employer (Labour Code section 71). No consideration was given for the harm and trauma many of these “high risk setting” workers had suffered for over two years. The returning workers were essentially being forced into making a decision based on no information of what the return would entail.
They were given 23 days to decide if they wanted to return to an employer who had, hand-in-hand with the Unions, violated their employee and labour rights (Trade Union Act s54(a)(3)) and under whom many of these employees experienced bullying, discriminatory and unequal treatment and actions that continue to defy logic and scientific fact,” says Tara Ibrahim, Citizens’ Alliance NS Board Member. “These actions, by both Unions and NSH, set labour relations back decades if not centuries.
The NSH ultimatum issued to affected employees didn’t allow for any time to have conversations with their Unions or follow proper process for grievances and complaints. “CANS was hearing from many of the employees that after receiving the NSH letter they reached out to their unions and managers but received either no response or responses that said they had no information to share at this time, and that the unions themselves needed to meet with their own legal teams first before they could give any specific information,” says Ibrahim.
On March 12 an ex parte injunction was filed by an affected NSH applicant in the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia against NSH to prevent the automatic termination of employees if they had not responded to NSH with their intent by March 15.
The injunction was heard in Halifax on Friday March 15th at 9:30AM with an NSH staff lawyer present. The outcomes: (1) NSH agreed to the elimination of the deadline for the applicant and (2) after engaging in spotty to no communication with all the affected employees for over two years, NSH offered to have dialogue with the applicant in reference to return-to-work conditions and addressing concerns around labour law violations.

Related Articles

ALBERTA’S DAMNING COVID-19 REPORT: What’s In it & What’s Missing

The recent report on Alberta’s COVID-19 pandemic response is a welcomed first step, hopefully of many, towards an open and honest dialogue about the COVID-19 debacle. While much of the information presented isn’t new to those who weren’t lobotomized by the relentless gaslighting, politicians and public health authorities have, until now, been able to keep such inconvenient facts from being officially recognized. This overdue recognition is, in itself, a very BIG deal.

Research Involving Human Subjects: Is Nova Scotia Ready?

For simplicity’s sake, let’s just say that in clinical research/clinical trials, you, as a participant, will receive the Cadillac of care: no wait times for imaging, diagnostic tests, prompt medical attention if you experience what is referred to as an Adverse Event (AE). This highlights the sad reality that in Nova Scotia with a deeply challenged health care system (shortage of medical personnel, equipment, IT infrastructure), your best bet to receive top-notch care, may be enrolling in a clinical trial.

Judicial Review update: April

All motions were granted by the court; a much desired outcome for CANS and its members: “The Applicant, Citizens’ Alliance of Nova Scotia (CANS), comes before this court seeking to engage the Judiciary to perform a vital and rigorous ‘check’ among the ‘checks and balances’ integral to Canada’s constitutional democracy. The Applicant is asking the Judicial branch of government to take a critical look at decisions and actions taken by the Executive branch of government to determine if they are reasonable and lawful”

How have I been? Well…

How have I been? Well…
I suppose it starts with the Freedom Convoy in Ottawa. It was an emotional few weeks, and it culminated in a violent quelling of a peaceful protest, which was perfectly in line with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Section 2(c) (the fundamental freedom of peaceful assembly). It was legal to participate in, and fund, such a gathering until the government decided to pass orders and measures which made it illegal.

To Moot Or Not To Moot

Mootness is the concept that some thing (incident or action) that was relevant at a given point in time is no longer relevant because that point in time for that issue/reason has passed. Most court cases against the pandemic lockdowns, restrictions and mandates across the country have been shut down due to Mootness.

Responses

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.