Judicial Review update on February 07 Hearing

Tuesday February 07 in Halifax started off as a crisp, chilly morning; very suitable for a much needed clear-headed day at the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia. There was a small crowd of supporters and more who joined online as we settled into the room to wait for Judge Keith to start the hearing.

CANS had requested accommodation for members who chose not to wear face masks while inside the courthouse hallways and courtroom. This accommodation was honoured by the staff and most especially the sheriffs who were cordial and helpful throughout the morning and into the afternoon.

The only matter before Judge Keith was that of adding a nurse co-applicant to the review; the amendments that were made to the notice were not being challenged. The nurse (SM) was present in the court, having driven in from the Valley where she lives. During a regular week she drives to New Brunswick to work in her trained profession as a nurse because she is not allowed to work in her home province without proof of Covid-19 vaccination. This despite the desperate shortage of trained healthcare workers that we in Nova Scotia are currently experiencing and despite it being common knowledge, amongst even the most disconnected of us, that these “vaccines” do not stop the spread of the infection (many of us know jabbed friends and colleagues who have had Covid-19 multiple times). Go figure.

The court session started shortly after 10:00 AM and ended just before 1:00 with one break in between. Counsel for CANS clearly and passionately described the harm that the Chief Medical Officer’s re-stated health Orders had caused and continue to cause especially to our healthcare workers and to those involved or employed in what were deemed (but never defined) as “High risk settings”. She extolled the arbitrary and illogical nature of the mandates; the ever-moving target of the re-stated  Orders making the corresponding changes to the Judicial Review inevitable; the great harm to so many Nova Scotians from being affected by the unnecessary and ineffective restrictions. The Respondents’ counsel focussed on how process and timelines may be in question.

The judge did what judges must do: ask clarifying questions of both sides, consider the arguments that have been offered and apply legal tests to help arrive at a decision.

Mootness did come up but this was an agenda item to be addressed at a future hearing. Consider this analogy: harm and damage done with knowledge and intent cannot be mooted just as assault cannot be mooted simply because it stops. 

The judge wrapped up the day’s session and reserved his decision until next Friday (February 17 Please see correction below). Counsel for both sides have been asked to provide some further information to inform that decision.

It was a long court session and we were exhausted by the time it was over, we all left with a sense of unfinished business around the proceedings and the most we can expect from the process is that it will result in a fair, reasonable, logical, and ethically sound conclusion.

Update February 18, 2023: I must apologize for not sharing the fully accurate information: Justice Keith reserved decision and requested case law research and submissions from Counsel for both sides on a point of law concerning the Civil Procedure Rules governing Judicial Review, this was due on Feb 17. He granted a few days after that for Counsel to respond to each others’ submissions. He will then set a return date on which to render his decision (this date has not yet been set) and establish deadlines for the Applicants’ anticipated Record Motion, challenging the deficiency of the Record which the Government filed with the Court on October 31, 2022.

Related Articles

Judicial Review update: April

All motions were granted by the court; a much desired outcome for CANS and its members: “The Applicant, Citizens’ Alliance of Nova Scotia (CANS), comes before this court seeking to engage the Judiciary to perform a vital and rigorous ‘check’ among the ‘checks and balances’ integral to Canada’s constitutional democracy. The Applicant is asking the Judicial branch of government to take a critical look at decisions and actions taken by the Executive branch of government to determine if they are reasonable and lawful”

How have I been? Well…

How have I been? Well…
I suppose it starts with the Freedom Convoy in Ottawa. It was an emotional few weeks, and it culminated in a violent quelling of a peaceful protest, which was perfectly in line with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Section 2(c) (the fundamental freedom of peaceful assembly). It was legal to participate in, and fund, such a gathering until the government decided to pass orders and measures which made it illegal.


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Great work, guys, I am impressed that you were accomodated for ‘masks’, unbelievable that we are forced masks still! what a great article and you know with what is going on, the courts know it!
    these were made up laws! they are just playing the game, NOTHING was voted in Parliament, all these masks/vaccines are not apart of our laws. This is why they are dragging their feet, they don’t know how to keep up the lies!

  2. Glad to hear about not pushing the mask. It does not work and this has been proven and yet still we see many wearing them. I look forward to hearing the results on Feb 17th. Thank you for the update.

    1. Response from Sarah M: I haven’t been discriminated against based on my vaccine status and it’s been so good to be treated as an equal. Where I work (NB) there are no different requirements for vaccinated or unvaccinated nurses or patients. As it should be!