Nova Scotia Health Authority Rescinds Covid-19 Proof-of-Vaccination

On February 21 the below letter was received by a healthcare professional currently on unpaid leave due to the Covid 19 mandates still being enforced by Nova Scotia Health (NSH).

Information on related infractions such as personal rights, monetary loss, mental health deterioration, the harms from societal segregation, harms to family life & cohesion and of course loss of professional advancement and reputation have not been addressed yet by the NSH nor the NSGEU to whom the letter is copied. It is imperative that the above listed harms are not allowed to be simply brushed under the rug; too much damage resulted in the ill-advised Covid-19 policies that were fervently enforced upon the Nova Scotian population and particularly upon the Healthcare sector.

Additionally, the below Position Statement was posted on the NSHealth.ca website on February 21 under their policy section. I am sure everyone is very interested in seeing the “evolving evidence” that caused this change in policy.

Source: https://policy.nshealth.ca/Site_Published/covid19/document_render.aspx?documentRender.IdType=6&documentRender.GenericField&documentRender.Id=106648&fbclid=IwAR3MKuXeRwv0XRI89cGuxk3d6hjwOYsQcMBLb8IhTWegkHZZUQ_eD1W-8z8_aem_AUGHjUxYXxWIptkI_d3bP4B-P3CD6jpW7MR-Y3S-9tFJuoJdp3UoIm_fsC_98v1Ukas

Related Articles

ALBERTA’S DAMNING COVID-19 REPORT: What’s In it & What’s Missing

The recent report on Alberta’s COVID-19 pandemic response is a welcomed first step, hopefully of many, towards an open and honest dialogue about the COVID-19 debacle. While much of the information presented isn’t new to those who weren’t lobotomized by the relentless gaslighting, politicians and public health authorities have, until now, been able to keep such inconvenient facts from being officially recognized. This overdue recognition is, in itself, a very BIG deal.

Judicial Review update: April

All motions were granted by the court; a much desired outcome for CANS and its members: “The Applicant, Citizens’ Alliance of Nova Scotia (CANS), comes before this court seeking to engage the Judiciary to perform a vital and rigorous ‘check’ among the ‘checks and balances’ integral to Canada’s constitutional democracy. The Applicant is asking the Judicial branch of government to take a critical look at decisions and actions taken by the Executive branch of government to determine if they are reasonable and lawful”

How have I been? Well…

How have I been? Well…
I suppose it starts with the Freedom Convoy in Ottawa. It was an emotional few weeks, and it culminated in a violent quelling of a peaceful protest, which was perfectly in line with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Section 2(c) (the fundamental freedom of peaceful assembly). It was legal to participate in, and fund, such a gathering until the government decided to pass orders and measures which made it illegal.

To Moot Or Not To Moot

Mootness is the concept that some thing (incident or action) that was relevant at a given point in time is no longer relevant because that point in time for that issue/reason has passed. Most court cases against the pandemic lockdowns, restrictions and mandates across the country have been shut down due to Mootness.

Bill 419

Interestingly PHIA already has provisions – 31(l) and 38(1)(g) – which allow for the Minister to collect personal health information for the purpose of planning and management of the health system. It also already contains provisions for the Minister to collect that information for the purposes of creating or maintaining an electronic health record at 31(o). The difference now, however, seems to be that custodians will no longer be able to refuse to disclose your personal health information to the government.

Responses

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.